Entertainment Earth
[TF.N Main] [Contact Us]
[Jedi Council - Main]
[Jedi Council -  More]


[EU Roundtable]
[Popular Stories]
CEII: Jabba's Palace Reunion - Massive Guest Announcements

Star Wars Night With The Tampa Bay Storm Reminder

Stephen Hayford Star Wars Weekends Exclusive Art

ForceCast #251: To Spoil or Not to Spoil

New Timothy Zahn Audio Books Coming

Star Wars Celebration VII In Orlando?

May The FETT Be With You

Mimoco: New Mimobot Coming May 4th

[Jedi Council Forums]
Who Doesn't Hate Jar Jar anymore?

Fans who grew up with the OT-Do any of you actually prefer the PT?

Should darth maul have died?

What plotline, character or scene in the entire Saga irritates you the most?

The misconceptions you had about Star Wars, when you were a kid
There are no polls
currently operating
in this sector.
Please check
back soon.

View Poll Archives


1997-1998 - 1999 - 2000 - 2001 - 2002+

Canon = Personal Preference

The matter of what can be considered "Star Wars Canon" has always been a controversial one. Star Wars was originally the set of three movies, but over time it has expanded, as most marketing gold mines do :) , into the realms of books, comics, CCG, computer games, and so on. The creation of these new expansions has involved new stories based on the material of the original movies, penned by independent authors, etc. So what is considered the Official Events that Took Place in the Star Wars Universe, i.e. canon... Is canon defined by George Lucas? GL accepts and/or authorizes the new material, as far as I know. Does this mean that he likes all of the new material? Maybe. He allowed the Outrider to be seen in SW:SE. But who really knows? Having taken this position, George & co. now actually leave the question up to the individual fan. He takes the safest, most secure route: give the budding talent authors, sci-fi writer dilletantes, comic artists, etc. (SW fans all, obviously) the creative freedom they desire, and let the fans fight it out- ...er, decide for themselves. Here begins the question that all Star Wars fans must eventually ask themselves: "When I think of Star Wars, should I think of just the movies, or everything else as well? In my mind, does the SW Universe contain just the events of the movies, or also those of the (books, comics, you name it)?" Purists say "Just the Movies". Others accept the new material. It can't really be divided up into black and white, though. Are there people who accept everything? I doubt it. I know people who like SOME of the books, but absolutely refuse to regard certain novels as "canon". Again, it becomes entirely personal. I, for example, refuse to accept that the Emperor was cloned, as it makes Anakin's sacrifice (not to mention the Rebellion) pointless. This would seem to give me purist leanings, right? But on the other side of the coin, I also can't really accept the worm in the asteroid in TESB for some reason. This is just how I feel; It is neither wrong nor right, it is relative. The whole scenario ultimately degenerates into an "us vs. them" argument: relative personal standpoints, pointlessly fighting to be absolute (Much the same as the Star Trek vs. Star Wars question). I'll admit that I'm not always as detached and accepting as I should be, but that's natural. It is the hallmark of a Star Wars fan to respect others views; just so long as we all hold to this ideal, we will stay on the right track.

Terrence Daniels

Entertainment Earth
[All Posters]
Zam Wesell - Episode II - Stand Up
Search For Posters, Cardboard Stand-Ups & T-Shirts!
Upcoming Birthdays
(next 10 days)
6/6 - Daniel Logan
[Rebelscum.com - Star Wars Collecting]
[TheForce.Net - FanFilms]
[TheForce.Net - FanForce] [TheForce.Net - Fan Art]
TheForce.Net - Your Daily Dose of Star Wars Entertainment Earth
The Galaxy is Listening
Entertainment Earth
[TF.N Main] [TF.N FAQ] [Contact Us]