Thanks to:
Note the ridge running along the keel-line of the roof of the main docking bay area. Note how the irregular crenulated terrain is composed of carefully cut sections of what appears to be cardboard or plastic. Each layer corresponds to several decks of the vessel, which presumably are more functionally interrelated than decks of adjacent sheet layers.
Ventral tail detail.
Model builders wear surgical masks at one stage in the model construction.
Starboard rear quarter detail.
Starboard rear quarter detail.
Anthony Tully declares the following definitions for use in the discussion, modified and clarified using suggestions by Martyn Griffiths:
The keel (axis) armature has one mount point. Amount point has a plug matching the surrounding model surface. Plugs cover those mount points which are not in use at any particular moment. The mount point is a place where an external frame is connected to the internal support structure of the model, and power and cooling are piped to the light systems. The mount point of the axial amature branch is on a ventral surface.
The fantail armature has at least one mount point, on the starboard side. It is possible that no mount point was completed for the port side. This may be partly responsible for a bias in range of shots seen on film. With only one exception, all shots showing the fantail undercarriage are portside shots. The exception is the distant full-length image seen during the pursuit from Bespin. However it is likely that the whole sequence containing this shot is inverted horizontally. (The interior bridge shots are definitely inverted, according to the insignia of the officers.)
It is also possible that the starboard side of the model was less complete or less detailed than the port side. This would account for the lack of certain desirable shots in the films, such as any close flyover similar to the Devastator's debut in A New Hope. It is known that the Avenger model was significantly more detailed on the vertical crenulated surface of one side.
There are only two confirmed mounting points: ventral keel, and fantail starboard. Paucity of mount points (compared to the number on the Avenger) indicates the low priority to which the Executor was assigned in the screenplay and storyboards. The vessel's role in The Empire Strikes Back was upgraded when its full beauty was appreciated, but the lack of mount points was a constraint on the range of possible camera shots. It is possible that the number of mounting points was low because of the original low priority given to the ship.
All engines were probably completed and functional, for the sake of the cameraman's freedom. Absence of lighting in some engines (for instance the starboard nozzles) would have caused unaesthetic imbalance in the visible distribution of engine glow on the fantail undercarriage. It is possible that the central engine of the fantail drive bank has a removeable light element, in order to provide another mount point.
Other asymmetries remain on the dorsal surfaces of the ship.
This page was constructed and is maintained by
Curtis Saxton
<saxton@physics.usyd.edu.au>.
This page is neither affiliated with nor endorsed by Lucasfilm Ltd.
Images included in or linked from this page are copyright Lucasfilm Ltd. and are used here under Fair Usage terms of copyright law.
This site is kindly hosted by TheForce.net.